We are The Watchers. We are three movie buffs on a mission to bring you real views on movies - no bull, no lies, just real gut instincts. We watch then we record as soon as we get out of the theatre!
The Watchers
Showing posts with label jeff daniels. Show all posts
Showing posts with label jeff daniels. Show all posts
Thursday, 3 December 2015
Review: Steve Jobs (UK Cert 15)
When Steve Jobs died in 2011, he was lauded as a genius, the man who revolutionised home computing, a pioneer, a visionary. Even before he passed, his name was one everyone knew. There was a lacklustre (and unofficial) biopic movie released in 2013 starring Ashton Kutcher but this one is based on the official biography by Walter Isaacson, adapted for screen by Aaron Sorkin and directed by Danny Boyle.
The film focuses on three points within Jobs' profession career: the 1984 launch of the Macintosh, the 1988 launch of the NeXT and the 1998 launch of the iMac. Immediately before each launch, we see Jobs preparing to give his trademark speeches, pushing his programmers to deliver the goods, dealing with his Head of Marketing and trying to interact with the girl whom the courts declared to be his daughter (although he initially did not acknowledge her as such).
Michael Fassbender pulls off an amazing balancing act of getting you to admire Jobs whilst simultaneously wanting to punch him in the face. If this is what Jobs was really like, it's amazing that he ever got anyone to work for him: he's a complete control freak, an out-and-out ruthless bastard, a Machiavellian gameplayer, a supremely arrogant, condescending, egotistical bully- and yet utterly charismatic at the same time. There has to be something more there, otherwise he'd never have inspired such loyalty as you see in his Head of Marketing, Joanna Hoffman (who stayed with him for this entire period, even when he was out in the cold from Apple).
Hoffman is played by Kate Winslet, who affects an Eastern European lilt to play the Polish-born Hoffman. She is the voice of reason, Jobs' anchor, his confidante and 'work wife' who deals with his demands with unflappable equanimity. Winslet's performance is strong, trading verbal spars with Fassbender and being one of the few who can stand up to him. Seth Rogen puts in a decent dramatic turn as Apple co-founder Steve Wozniak, pushing Jobs to acknowledge the team who worked on the Apple II in his newer endeavours. There are scenes between Wozniak and Jobs which have a real dramatic punch, especially the one where Wozniak tells Jobs 'you can be decent and gifted at the same time'.
Not all performances are as good as others, however, with Katherine Waterston's shrill and overbearing performance as Chrisann Brennan (the mother of Jobs' daughter Lisa) being particularly grating. I get that the character is supposed to come across as a bit flaky and annoying- trying to get Jobs to accept his paternal responsibilities when he still questions his paternity- but it's the one wrong note in an otherwise solid cast.
Sorkin's script is, as you would expect, tight and quick with lots of staccato punchy dialogue and flashbacks within the scenes. It's very play-like, the dialogue could easily lend itself to a stage adaptation. However, the script never really gets behind the spiky exterior- although it does attempt a last-minute redemption job with his relationship with Lisa which just about works. Do you really get to know more about Jobs the man? A little. For instance, I didn't know that he was adopted and I didn't know he had a daughter. So you get to know more about his biography (for want of a better word). But the psychology doesn't run very deep- the film implies that a lot of Jobs' controlling personality came down to the fact that he was adopted, which is mentioned a lot- and he remains relatively inscrutable.
This is certainly a superior movie to the Ashton Kutcher one and the performances- especially those of Fassbender, Winslet and Rogen- are very strong. However, I think you'd have to have a specific interest in Jobs to really enjoy it.
Rating: 4 out of 5
Tez
Tuesday, 9 October 2012
Review: Looper (UK Cert 15)
Looper’s premise is this: in the not-too-distant future (how
many times have we heard that?) time travel is invented, but it’s outlawed
almost immediately. Getting rid of a body in the future is near to impossible –
so organised crime sets up the Loopers. Loopers are hit-men but they are 30
years in the past, before time travel is invented- the future mafia send the
victims back in time and the Looper takes care of them and their body in the
past. But what happens when your next victim is your future self?
Now this premise intrigued me when I saw the trailer- I
asked myself, how are they going to pull that off well, especially when you’re
jumping around timelines and raising questions like, the future me will know
everything I’m doing… or have done? It’s a great idea, great concept and a new
twist on a sci-fi great – time travel. I thought. Unfortunately what you get is
a mess of a film. It flitters along at a dull pace, taking far too long to set
up a world to only then fail to deliver an exciting story and resolution.
The film stars Joseph Gordon-Levitt, Bruce Willis and Emily
Blunt. Levitt does his best with what he’s got, basically having to imitate a
young Willis – under some freaky make up that augments his face to make him
look like a young Bruce Willis. Unfortunately, Mr Levitt, relying on the make-up
for the role doesn't work. Bruce Willis has never been so clearly taking the
paycheck than here – he emotes his feelings of anguish by touching his forehead
and looking longingly at his past self – but it just is such a lazy performance.
Emily Blunt gives a great performance in a terrible film, her dialogue as a
mother who was estranged from her son is just unbelievable – who talks like
this? I know – no one does.
I could happily dissect just why this film is so bad – but
to do so without spoilers is a nightmare! So to just simply say that this
film’s style pallet is eclectic, its grasp of human behaviour is a joke, its
plot has more holes than a sieve and the ending of this film is so ridiculous
that it actually creates more issues than I can count!
Avoid.
Rating: 1 out of 5
Rhys
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)

